The ratio of AMH’s area of land of the existing abattoir is to the area of increase of additional floor space for the reconstruction and modernization of the existing abattoir must be challenged. It is with complete naivety bordering on incompetence that DLGP should have excepted this comparison as a basis to waver the EIS on 20 January 1997, especially that in the absence of the EPA’s determination on EIS (EPA’s response arrived on 22 January 1997: two days late and recommend an EIS be undertaken) also no involvement of the QLD Health Department to consider health risk assessment of inhabitants of surrounding suburbs, and the only other material relied upon was supplied AMH (Supplementary Information of February 1996) which is full of omissions and misleading.